As we all know, the proposed new regulator of immigration consultants, ICCRC, is in fact CAPIC, an immigration consultants' trade association. The President/CEO of ICCRC is former CAPIC President Phil Mooney, and all ICCRC self-appointed board members are also from CAPIC. CAPIC has launched several millions of dollars in litigation against CSIC. CSIC Members pay for this litigation through membership fees to CSIC. Interestingly, CAPIC complains about high membership fees, yet it is CAPIC's constant litigation against CSIC that is to blame for these so-called high membership fees.
CAPIC has access to several millions of dollars to fund their litigation against CSIC. the source of these millions of dollars in funding in not known. However, Chinese crooked consultants and their investor clients, as mentioned in the recent Globe & Mail article at "How China's Crooked Consultants Help the Rich Enter Canada" would easily have access to the millions of dollars required to bankrupt CSIC through a neverending stream of litigation against CSIC by CAPIC. It is well-known that CAPIC's President Hemlin has been ordered revoked as a result of his work with a Chinese ghost agent and Chinese investor clients.
How many CAPIC board members are getting rich working with these Chinese crooked consultants and their investor clients? These CAPIC members would all want to shut down CSIC for hindering their very profitable work with Chinese crooked consultants and their Chinese investor clients.
Perhaps we should start by looking carefully at the list of names on the petition set up by CAPIC to support their bid to be the new regulator and to get rid of CSIC. The ICCRC will be a regulator that better protects the business interests of crooked immigration consultants, and no doubt crooked consultants will support ICCRC over CSIC.
The main question that arises is to what extent does Minister Kenney have knowledge of CAPIC's relationship with Chinese crooked consultants? Does he know who is funding CAPIC's scheme to bankrupt CSIC, or has he been duped by Mooney through Les Linklater?
No comments:
Post a Comment