CAPIC's Consortium of Ghost Consultants: Funding ICCRC's Bid to be Regulator

CAPIC Members have launched a continuous stream of litigation against CSIC costing millions of dollars. Who pays the legal fees?

Start with CAPIC's seemingly limitless access to millions of dollars to pay for constant litigation against CSIC. ICCRC allows companies to be members. CSIC does not. Bill C35 will make it illegal for some very rich multinational immigration consulting companies to operate in Canada. These very powerful immigration consulting companies, essentially ghost consultants, will be out of business if CSIC continues as regulator and Bill C35 makes ghost consulting illegal. ICCRC as regulator ensures theses ghost consulting companies can continue to operate, ripping off immigrants and then paying a fine if someone makes a complaint. Are the millions of dollars in litigation fees for CAPIC's litigation provided by these ghost consultant companies who, despite Bill C35, are protected if ICCRC becomes the regulator?

There is also a decision on CSIC's website involving CAPIC's president, Jeffrey Hemlin who signed and sold blank use of representative forms to his Chinese ghost agent. Are fees paid to CAPIC members by Chinese ghost agents then used to fund litigation against CSIC?

Who pays for CSIC's legal bills? CSIC Members pay through membership fees. Hence CSIC's reportedly high membership fees are the direct result of millions of dollars in litigation launched by CAPIC. Then CAPIC campaigns that CSIC should be replaced by ICCRC which will have lower membership fees. Why are ICCRC membership fees lower? Because litigation against the regulator will stop when Phil Mooney and CAPIC are in charge.

Bill C35 is in fact more appropriately named the Protecting Crooked Consultants Act. The proposal to put ICCRC in charge of regulating immigration consultants amounts to the de-regulation of immigration consultants. ICCRC will favour the business interests of immigration consultants over the protection of the public; that means cashing in on the ghost consultants rather than putting them out of business.